714-294-2125
  • Home
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
Web Search Pros - ADA Compliant Web Design and Optimization
  • Home
  • Website Design Info
  • ADA Accessibility and Compliance
  • Services
    • Website Design Development
    • Search Engine Optimization
  • Recent Lawsuits
  • Getting Started
  • Contact Us
Select Page

MARTIN v. MANNKIND CORPORATION

by administration | Dec 23, 2020 | Pharmaceuticals

Plaintiff

  • Name: Dominick Martin
  • Filing date: December 11, 2020
  • State of filing: California

Defendant

  • Name: Mankind Corporation
  • Website: www.afrezza.com
  • Industry: Pharmaceuticals
  • Summary: The Mankind Corporation manufactures and sells Afrezza, a prescription-only insulin inhalation powder for diabetics.

Case Summary

On December 11, 2020, Dominick Martin filed a Complaint in California State court against Mankind Corporation. Plaintiff Dominick Martin alleges that www.afrezza.com is not accessible per the WCAG 2.0 accessibility standard(s).

Case Details

Plaintiff alleges issues in its Complaint including the following:

  • Missing alternative text
  • Empty headings
  • Empty buttons
  • Empty links that contain no text

Plaintiff asserts the following cause(s) of action in its Complaint:

Violations of the Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code § 51 et seq

Plaintiff seeks the following relief by way of its Complaint:

  • For a judgment that Defendant violated Plaintiff’s rights under the Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code § 51 et seq.
  • For a preliminary and permanent injunction requiring Defendant to take the steps necessary to make the Website  readily accessible to and usable by visually-impaired individuals; but Plaintiff hereby expressly limits the injunctive relief to require that Defendant expend no more $20,000 as the cost of injunctive relief
  • An award of statutory minimum damages of $4,000 per violation pursuant to section 52(a) of the California Civil Code; however, Plaintiff expressly limits the total amount of recovery, including statutory damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, and cost of injunctive relief not to exceed $74,999
  • For attorneys’ fees and expenses pursuant to all applicable laws including, without limitation, California Civil Code § 52(a); however, Plaintiff expressly limits the total amount of recovery, including statutory damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, and cost of injunctive relief not to exceed $74,999
  • For pre-judgment interest to the extent permitted by law
  • For costs of suit
  • For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.

Categories

  • Apparel
  • Automobile
  • Automobiles & Components
  • Banks
  • Beauty
  • Beverages
  • Biotechnology & Life Sciences
  • Capital Goods
  • Commercial & Professional Services
  • Commercial Services & Supplies
  • Communications Equipment
  • Construction Materials
  • Consumer Durables
  • Consumer Goods
  • Consumer Services
  • Consumer Staples
  • Cooking Products
  • Dinnerware
  • Diversified Consumer Services
  • Diversified Financials
  • E-commerce
  • Educational
  • Energy Equipment & Services
  • Entertainment
  • Finance
  • Food
  • Food & Staples Retailing
  • Food Products
  • Furniture
  • Health Care Equipment & Services
  • Hotel
  • Household & Personal Products
  • Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers
  • Insurance
  • Internet Software and Services
  • Jewelry
  • Landscaping
  • Leisure
  • Leisure Products
  • Materials
  • Media
  • Medical
  • Online Store
  • Pet Company
  • Pet Shop
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Real Estate
  • Restaurant and Leisure
  • Retailing
  • Software & Services
  • Technology Hardware & Equipment
  • Telecommunication Services
  • Textile
  • Title III and ADA Complaint Websites
  • Tobacco
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
  • Utilities
  • Utility Tools

Tags

California New York
  • Home
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
Developed by Web Search Pros